Omni Healthcare Communications
  • Home
  • Scientific Communications
  • Stakeholder Relations
  • Digital Solutions
    • Audience Amplification
    • Interactive Posters
    • Online Medical Education
  • Strategic Consulting
  • Resources
    • Communications
    • Omni-HC Blog
    • Tools
    • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Specialized Services
    • IME On Demand >
      • Strategies For Improving RFPs
      • Strategic Consulting
      • Case Study
      • Biopharma Educational Alphabet

10/26/2020

Planning Tools and Tactics to Achieve Cross-functional Alignment

0 Comments

Read Now
 

By Michael Caso, Managing Partner

In my last post, Challenges/Barriers to Stakeholder Integrated Plan Development, the need and execution outline for a cross-functional “Vison Workshop” was introduced.  This workshop forms the foundation of short-and long-term stakeholder planning.  Once the consensus on cross-functional objectives are identified for the next 1 to 3 years, you are ready to begin tactical planning designed to accomplish your targets.
There is no shortage of companies with electronic tools to facilitate stakeholder planning and tactical execution.  Monocol, Pharmaspectra and PulsePoint all have stakeholder tools. Whether you are in the early stages of Stakeholder Engagement and require tactics like identification, profiling and mapping or in more advanced stages of engagement, the tools you utilize to document the tactics developed by the cross-functional team should demonstrate a number of characteristics:
  • Utilizes the “KISS” Principle (Keep it Simple Stupid) - The level of simplicity will vary depending on:
    • The commercialization stage of the product (early/mid/late-stage development or post-launch)
    • The company experience in the marketplace
    • The number of cross-functional disciplines involved in the planning
    • Manpower and financial resources available to facilitate the planning and execution process
  • Cross-functional‒friendly
    • Is sensitive to the lexicon and tactics of your stakeholder planning team?
  • Commercialization stage adaptive
    • Can easily mirror the objectives of the Vision Workshop rolling 1 to 3-year plan
  • Facilitates and tracks a continuum of engagements with KOLs
    • Identifies a progressive level of collaboration based on mutual interest and benefit
  • Capable of tracking (and measuring) activities from strategic to transactional engagements
    • Interactions at annual congresses or KOL offices
So, let’s get specific about some simple tools for planning that will help to ensure cross-functional alignment for Stakeholder engagements.  My organization, Omni Healthcare Communications, has made a number of these available on our website (https://www.omni-hc.com/tools.html).  Several of these key tools are addressed below: 
  • Stakeholder Engagement Plan Template – A basic general template that can accommodate cross-functional planning.  Once all of the individual team member plans have been created using this document, a consolidated plan can be established.
  • Stakeholder Analysis Matrix – This template expands the traditional thinking of external stakeholders as only HCPs to additional influencer categories of government, societies, patient advocacy groups, etc.
  • Individual Stakeholder Analysis – As stated previously, there are many organizations that can support your needs for identifying, profiling and mapping stakeholders.  The systems they provide can create great volumes of data on an individual target.  However, this Individual Stakeholder Analysis template should be sufficient for initial use.   
  • Tactical Plan – Once stakeholder strategies are identified by segment, it will be critical to identify tactics designed to accomplish those strategies.  The tactical plan template will help to ensure that strategies and tactics (by stakeholder segment) are linked.  The strategies and tactics should be updated with the annual plan.
  • Engagement Planning – Two templates are provided—one for centralized, strategic engagements and another for transactional, MSL interactions.  The forms can be useful in identifying collaborative opportunities between your organization and the targeted stakeholder.
  • Engagement Tracking – Again, there are many highly sophisticated tools available.  However, the basic needs of documenting your interactions can be accomplished with the MS Access Database, Stakeholder Simple Database, which is available on our Omni-HC.com/tools.html page.
Ok, we’ve now looked at the history of stakeholder relations, challenges/barriers to integrated plan development, as well as planning tools to achieve cross-functional alignment.  Our next series of posts will focus on various ways to engage external stakeholders, whether they be strategic or transactional. 

Share

0 Comments

10/14/2020

Challenges/ Barriers to Stakeholder Integrated Plan Development

0 Comments

Read Now
 

by Michael Caso, Managing Partner

As I stated in my last post, gaining agreement on the need for an integrated Stakeholder Relations plan is easy to accomplish.  However, there are significant challenges and barriers to accomplishing a truly integrated plan that satisfies the needs/objectives of all internal partners, as well as the external stakeholders targeted for engagement.

Having sat on “both sides of the desk,” at a Pharma company creating cross-functional planning and engaging stakeholders and, now in an agency supporting the needs of clients in developing integrated plans, I can provide some unique perspectives.  There is saying indicating that “your ability to be objective is in direct proportion to your distance from the problem.”  Internal stakeholders are “close to the problem,” having a number of individual objectives that may not be compatible with those of their colleagues.  Therefore, there are some benefits in employing an independent third party to facilitate the creation and coordination of cross-functional planning meetings.

One way to identify and address barriers/challenges to the development of an integrated Stakeholder Plan is through the creation of a cross-functional planning workshop.  These types of programs are called different names in various organizations, but at Omni-HC, we refer to them as Vision Workshops.  The word Vision addresses the need for a long-term “view or perspective” on the various internal and external stakeholders regarding mutually beneficial collaborative opportunities. 

Key steps in the creation and execution of this Vision Workshop include:
  • The identification of the cross-functional team
    • Who are they?
      • What departments, which individuals?
  • The creation of a Stakeholder Engagement Survey
    • For internal Stakeholders
      • What are their expectations/objectives and needs for external engagement over the next 1-3 years?
      • What are the specific roles/responsibilities identified for external stakeholders?
    • For potential External Stakeholders
      • What are their goals in collaborating with Pharma companies?
      • What type of responsibilities (prioritized) are they interested in performing (research, consultation, education)?
      • How much time are they willing and able to allocate?
      • What are their preferences for mode of communication?
  • Cross-functional Planning Meeting(s)
    • Sharing of survey results
    • Identification of cross-functional gaps
    • Identification of opportunities to mitigate gaps
    • Creation of consensus complimentary Stakeholder Engagement objectives for next 1- 3 years
    • Creation of a visual depiction or map of achieving these evolving objectives over time with specific milestones
    • Agreement on the frequency and mode of cross-functional team interactions

Having completed this Vision exercise, we are now better prepared to develop the Stakeholder Relations  Integrated Plan.  The tools and techniques for accomplishing this next important task will be the subject of my next blog.

Share

0 Comments

9/30/2020

The Need for Strategic, Integrated Stakeholder Relations Planning in the Post-pandemic Environment

2 Comments

Read Now
 

By Michael Caso Managing Partner

My tenure in the healthcare industry spans more years than I care to recall.  When working for a pharma company or an agency, a starting point for product business planning -- at any stage of commercialization -- has been the engagement of stakeholders as researchers, consultants or peer-to-peer educators.
  
 
The lexicon for this engagement has changed over time from Advocacy Development, to Thought Leader Development, to KOL or Opinion Leader Management to today’s nomenclature of Stakeholder Relations.  “Ownership” in an organization for conducting these activities has also changed.  Initially seated in Marketing, Stakeholder Engagement, is now Medical Affairs’ responsibility, whether centralized in a Strategic Planning Engagement position or localized in various functional areas such as Medical Science Liaisons and their transactional interactions to gain medical insights. 

In addition, the actual Stakeholders have changed.  There are internal team stakeholders, the traditional external scientific/medical targets, payers, as well as the emergence of patients and disease advocacy groups as key “movers and shakers.”   

​All of these changes in Stakeholder Relations terminology and ownership are further complicated by the current global pandemic that imposes access barriers.  The pandemic has produced diminished current (and potentially future) opportunities for Stakeholder interactions at annual congresses (with over XXX# cancelled or shifted to virtual programs) and introduced barriers to productive one-on-one transactional engagements in offices or institutions.  As a result, respectively top-tier Stakeholder relationships and critical medical insights have been negatively impacted.  This scenario creates a greater need for integrated strategic cross-functional Stakeholder Planning in the accomplishment of key corporate, medical and product objectives. 

Ok, so who are the team members that require integration and alignment on this internal team?  The specific plan development participants will vary depending on the commercialization phase, global or domestic launch plan and size of organization.  However, with Medical Affairs acting as the “bridge” or “conduit” between these departments, a potential list of key members includes: R&D, Commercial/Commercial Development, Patient Advocacy, and Market Access. 

Of course, each of these team members brings with them a targeted set of objectives that may not necessarily be complimentary with those of other teammates and a supreme headache for the Medical Affairs person responsible for coordinating the plan integration. 
​

More on these challenges in my next blog. 

Share

2 Comments
Details

    Author

    Omni-HC Blogs are written by members of the Omni-HC team.

    Archives

    January 2023
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020

    Categories

    All
    #audienceamplification
    Audience Amplification
    Medi
    Medical Affairs
    Medical Communications
    Medical Writing
    Opinion Leader Planning
    Pharmaceutical
    Publication Planning
    Publications Development
    Publication Search Optimization
    Scientific Communications
    Scientific Exchange
    Stakeholder Engagement
    Stakeholder Relations

    RSS Feed

© Copyright Omni Healthcare Communications LLC 2017-2020
Contact Us
Privacy
About
  • Home
  • Scientific Communications
  • Stakeholder Relations
  • Digital Solutions
    • Audience Amplification
    • Interactive Posters
    • Online Medical Education
  • Strategic Consulting
  • Resources
    • Communications
    • Omni-HC Blog
    • Tools
    • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Specialized Services
    • IME On Demand >
      • Strategies For Improving RFPs
      • Strategic Consulting
      • Case Study
      • Biopharma Educational Alphabet